다음과 같이 내용 공유합니다.
Considering Scalability of File Servers
A dependable file server platform must be scalable, manageable, and reliable enough to handle consolidated workloads.
Windows Server 2003 builds on the successful file server capabilities of Windows 2000 Server, delivering significant scalability advantages, as outlined in Table 1.
|
Feature |
OS version |
Theoretical |
Tested |
|
in Table 1.Maximum NTFS volume size |
Windows 2000 Server |
256 Terabytes (64 TB with Windows Volume Manager) |
16 Terabytes using 64 KB cluster size |
|
Windows Server 2003 |
256 Terabytes (64 TB with Windows Volume Manager) |
16 Terabytes using 64 KB cluster size | |
|
Maximum dynamic volume size |
Windows 2000 Server |
256 Terabytes (64 TB with Windows Volume Manager) |
2 Terabytes basic volume 64 Terabytes (Raid-0) |
|
Window Server 2003 |
256 Terabytes (64 TB with Windows Volume Manager) |
2 Terabytes basic volume 64 Terabytes (Raid-0) | |
|
Maximum file size on a volume |
Windows 2000 Server |
16 terabytes |
16 Terabytes using 64 KB clusters |
|
Window Server 2003 |
16 terabytes |
16 Terabytes using 64 KB clusters | |
|
Maximum number of files on a volume |
Windows 2000 Server |
4,294,967,295 files |
20,000,000 files |
|
Window Server 2003 |
4,294,967,295 files |
4,294,967,295 files | |
|
Maximum number of volumes per server |
Windows 2000 Server |
~2000 volumes |
~2000 volumes |
|
Window Server 2003 |
~2000 volumes |
~2000 volumes |
Windows 2000 , Windows 2003관련이며 2008에 대해서는 확인하여 추가로 올리겠습니다.
